claimroutineinferred_dep
Per-branch parameters satisfy layout hypotheses
Claim·§5.5 Constructing the forms and completing the proof·inside thmCounting zeros of sparse polynomials faster
Statement (paper)
For all sufficiently large , on each branch (with free variables, restricted scopes and ), if and , then with , , , , , , and , Lemma applies and Lemma supplies the required rows and measurement matrices, with , , and .
In plain English
For large , on each branch with free variables, if and , the explicit choices of , , , , and (in terms of ) meet the hypotheses of the incidence-parameters lemma, so the layout lemma supplies the needed rows and measurement matrices. These choices satisfy , , and .
Why it's here
This claim specializes the generic parameter lemma to a branch, using the bounded variable incidence from the branching step so that the scopes have the bounded size and multiplicity the lemma needs. It fixes the concrete sizes of , , , that the per-branch running-time and total-exponent computation uses.
Classified routine:
Direct parameter bookkeeping: it instantiates the earlier incidence-parameters lemma on each branch, using the bounded incidence from the branching claim, and then reads off the asymptotic sizes of r, Q, R and D.
Uses
Used by
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §5.5 Constructing the forms and completing the proof
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
main_full_version.tex:3129
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Per-branch design from parameter lemma" rests on claim-thm-overview-sparse-polynomials-1