claimroutineinferred_dep
Tape movement and Neumann iteration bounds
Tape movement and Neumann iteration fit in
closes the time bound of the resampling lemma
Statement (paper)
The remaining tape movement inside the quoted algorithms satisfies the claimed bound . In particular, with and , every iterate of the Neumann evaluation lies in and all computed partial sums are -bit records. The window scans, the calls of with their row additions, and the outer accumulation together cost , with the tape count and constants uniform in .
In plain English
The tape movement left over in the algorithms for and costs . With and , every Neumann iterate lies in , all partial sums are -bit records, and the window scans, the calls of with row additions, and the outer accumulation together cost .
Why it's here
This finishes the time bound of the parent lemma. The earlier claim bounded the arithmetic cost of the factors but left tape movement open. Here the number of Neumann terms is controlled via , so the iteration and its bookkeeping fit within with constants uniform in .
Classified routine:
Direct bookkeeping of tape movement and the Neumann-series iteration count, using the earlier claim's error and time bounds for the scaled maps together with the condition θ > p/α^4; no new idea beyond standard cost accounting.
Uses
Used by
Nothing in the paper
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §8.1 The one-dimensional interface
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
sections/07-resampling.tex:246
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Tape movement and Neumann iteration bounds" rests on claim-lem-no-sort-resampling-2