claimroutineinferred_dep
Coupling recurrence from child charges
Child charges sum to
turns escape, bucket and assembly bounds into the recurrence
Statement (paper)
For a task of budget and precision , after absorbing the fixed assembly factors into one fixed exponent , all coupled child charges are at most , since a child of budget used at group slack satisfies , groups with larger slack have identical children and contribute zero, and separate post-assembly queries with constant positive budget drop use . Together with Equation , this gives the complete coupling recurrence.
In plain English
For a task of budget and precision , all coupled child discrepancy charges sum to at most for one fixed exponent . Combined with the direct collision charge bound, this gives the full coupling recurrence.
Why it's here
Each child of budget used at group slack has , so the amplification from the escape, bucket and assembly steps is beaten by choosing large. Groups of larger slack have identical actual and clean children and contribute nothing, and post-assembly queries are treated as slack . This leaves a geometric sum plus the direct collision term, which the next claim closes by choosing , and .
Classified routine:
Bookkeeping step that combines the escape, bucket and assembly lemmas (lem-fp-escape, lem-fp-buckets, lem-atom-assembly) with the definition λ_m = λ_M 2^{-D_2(M-m)}. It reduces the child charges to a geometric sum and adds the direct collision charge from lem-fp-direct.
Uses
Used by
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §9.5 Closing the coupled induction
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
sections/fingerprints.tex:641
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Coupling recurrence from escape, collision, assembly" rests on lem:fp-buckets