claimroutineinferred_dep
Slice score lower bound via classification
Claim·§6.2 Classification and suppression of common variation·inside propCommon variation is negligible
Statement (paper)
For every slice , with an absolute constant , ; this holds in each case of the classification of the candidate set: empty, one candidate state, two candidates sharing a coordinate (all candidates in that row or column, or a third outside it), and no coordinate shared by distinct candidates.
In plain English
For every template slice , the sum of the scores is at least times the common variation , minus an error with absolute. This is checked case by case over the candidate set: empty, one candidate state, two candidates sharing a row or column, or distinct candidates sharing no coordinate.
Why it's here
This gives the slice-wise inequality that the next claim sums against to compare the score budget with the common contributions . The classification of candidates into strict-cross configurations shows that common variation forces a proportional score, and the bad-slot pairs are absorbed into the error as set up in the previous claim, with the transfer and ghost lemmas used to locate the true point state inside the selected support.
Classified routine:
A case-by-case verification within the proof of the common-variation lemma. It combines the preceding template-slice claim with the transfer and ghost lemmas to derive a slice-wise inequality, which is bookkeeping and not a new idea in its own right.
Uses
Used by
Figures
Figure 2schematicp. 31
Two candidate center states differing in both coordinates admit exactly two point states in their common strict cross. The filled points are those opposite corners. Within this four-state configuration, the bit of a consistent edge and the state at either endpoint determine the state at the other endpoint. Rows have fixed first label and columns have fixed second label. The diagram displays coordinate equalities of states, not geometric positions of the original plane points.
What it shows
Four states sit at the corners of a square formed by two horizontal and two vertical gray lines. Open circles at bottom-left and top-right are the candidate center states and . Filled blue circles at bottom-right and top-left are the two point states in their common strict cross. The horizontal sides are labeled and the vertical sides , showing that within this four-state configuration an edge bit together with either endpoint state determines the state at the other endpoint.
Read from the image by claude-opus-5.5 · confidence 72%
Sources
PaperOpen
- Section
- §6.2 Classification and suppression of common variation
- Page
- —
- Label
—- Line
sections/05-common-levels.tex:285
Leannot aligned
Phase 2 aligns this node to a Lean declaration.
Friction
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Slice score lower bound by strict-cross classification" rests on claim-com-variation-1
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Slice score lower bound by strict-cross classification" rests on com:transfer
- infoinferred_depoutline: "Slice score lower bound by strict-cross classification" rests on com:ghost